Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)  vs. Angiography

When it comes to diagnosing and treating cardiovascular conditions, medical advancements have provided interventional cardiologists with an array of tools and techniques.  

Among these, two prominent methods stand out: Fractional Flow Reserve FFR vs angiography. While both play crucial roles in assessing coronary artery health, they serve distinct purposes. 

Pill Box

Angiography is a widely used diagnostic procedure that involves injecting a contrast dye into the arteries and capturing  X-ray images (angiograms) to visualize blood vessel structures. 

Understanding Interventional Angiography: Visualizing Blood Vessels 

Circled Dot

In the context of cardiovascular health, coronary angiography is used to examine the coronary arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle.

Pie Chart

FFR is a functional measurement that assesses the blood flow within a coronary artery. 

Exploring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR): Measuring Blood Flow 

It’s calculated by measuring the pressure before and after a narrowing or blockage in the artery while a vasodilator is administered. 

When it comes to diagnosing and treating coronary artery disease, FFR Vs angiography complement each other.  

FFR vs Angiography: A Collaborative Approach 

Interventional angiography provides the visual roadmap of the coronary arteries, identifying potential trouble spots.

* Accurate Diagnosis. * Informed Treatment Decisions. * Reduced Interventions. * Personalized Care.

Benefits of FFR Vs Angiography 

Circled Dot

A Comprehensive Approach To conclude, in the realm of interventional cardiology, FFR Vs angiography are not competitors but allies. They work hand in hand to provide a comprehensive understanding of a patient’s coronary health.


Address 40, 52, 100 Feet Rd, Tanishq Jewellery, Periyar Nagar, Velaachery, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600042 Contact +91 83000 22222